A QUESTION OF RESULTS - LAW 21
- By Piloo Reporter
A result, be it that of a school or university exam
or a lottery, is always eagerly awaited. The same
holds true for a cricket match, be it a Test or a
one-day international.
In simple terms, the team that finishes with a
higher aggregate of runs in a two-innings-a-side
game, all four innings of which have been
'completed', is declared the winner. An innings
that ends through a declaration or forfeiture is
considered a 'complete' effort.
Four types of results are possible when Team A
plays Team B in a two-innings match:
1. Victory for Team A - defeat for Team B
2. Victory for Team B - defeat for Team A
3. Tie
4. Draw
Almost a match-winning innings - Nick Knight
on his way to an unbeaten 96 against Zimbabwe at
Bulawayo in 1996-97
If the team batting fourth (last) in a two-innings
game loses all ten wickets while chasing a target
set by its opponent, the latter is declared the
winner by the margin of runs that separates its
combined tally of runs from that of the former. If
the side batting fourth achieves its target by
surpassing its opponent's combined tally of runs,
it is declared the winner by the number of wickets
it has in store. Thus, if the batting team has lost
four wickets when it overhauls the target, the
margin of its win is six wickets. In such
instances, if a batsman has retired without falling
ill or sustaining an injury, his exit will be
considered a 'wicket' while determining the margin
of victory.
A side is regarded as having won a two-innings game
by an innings and some runs when it's score in its
only innings is greater than the combined total
achieved by its opponent in two innings.
Test cricket has had two instances of the match
finishing with both sides having the same combined
total. Such a match is called a 'Tie'. Australia
and the West Indies were involved in the first
'tied' Test, at Brisbane in 1960-61. The second
'tied' Test at Chennai in 1986-87 also featured
Australia.
Test matches that do not finish are termed as
'draws'.
Although the difference between a 'tie' and a
'draw' seems fairly straightforward, there can be
the odd instance wherein both these forms of
results come close to becoming synonymous. It needs
to be clarified that although they come close, they
do not become synonymous.
For a match to be declared a 'tie', it is necessary
that the side batting last is all out. But if it
has lost nine or lesser wickets at the end of the
final over and the scores are level, the match is
declared a draw. A Test between England and
Zimbabwe at Bulawayo in 1996-97 produced such a
finish. England needed three runs off the final
ball to win, but Nick Knight, the batsman on
strike, managed only two and the match ended in a
draw with the scores level. England had lost six
wickets at that stage.
I umpired a Kanga league game in the 1970s in which
Shivaji Park Gymkhana lost their ninth wicket off
the last ball of the match. Everybody knew that
SPG's no. 11 batsman had already been hospitalized
due to injury. National Cricket Club, the
opponents, had started 'celebrating' a win when
they received a shock. They could not believe their
ears when my colleague and I told them that it was
a draw. We explained to them that had they got the
ninth wicket off even the penultimate delivery of
the game, they would have been declared winners as
the no. 11 was definitely not going to bat. But the
ninth wicket had fallen off the final delivery of
the game and not a single ball was left in the
match! That was the difference.
The laws of cricket have a provision wherein a team
batting fourth can win despite falling short of the
target. This can happen if it gets 'penalty' runs
that enable it to inch ahead of their opponent's
combined total. A team that wins a match in this
fashion will be said to have won 'by penalty'.
- By Piloo Reporter