THE BORDER-GAVASKAR TROPHY - First Test, Bangalore -
PROS AND CONS
I. AUSTRALIA PROS, INDIA CONS
FRONTLINE BOWLERS IN THE FOREFRONT
It will be the first time Australia will play a
Test match in India with their frontline bowling
attack. Warne didn't tour in 1996-97, McGrath
missed the 1997-98 tour and Lee was injured before
the 2000-01 tour.
The other prize - Rival captains Adam Gilchrist and
Sourav Ganguly pose with the sponsor's trophy
It will also be the first time Warne will be
playing a Test in India when he is at the peak of
his fitness. He had toured India in 1997-98 and
2000-01 immediately after recovering from injury,
and was consequently short of match practice.
THE LITTLE BIG MAN'S ABSENCE???
The Indian team will be low on confidence after the
reverses it has suffered in the last three months.
If Sachin is ruled out of the first Test, the
pressure on Ganguly and his teammates will only
increase.
THE WILL TO WIN
Talent is all very fine, but at the highest level,
it is the hunger and will to win that counts. The
Aussies haven't conquered India since 1969-70.
Hungry, they surely will be.
AWESOME TWOSOME
India may bank on its spinners to torment the
Australian batsmen, but they do need to be
complemented by their teammates who will handle the
new ball and put some pressure on the opposition
with some early wickets. The question is; will Irfan
Pathan and his new-ball partner, whether is Zaheer
Khan or Ajit Agarkar, pose a realistic threat on
'flattish' Indian wickets to the Australian openers
Hayden and Langer, they who have made a habit out of
forging double-century opening partnerships and
scoring at four an over in Test match cricket? The
possibility of the Australian batsmen (read
'openers') having got off to a flying start and
being at the peak of their confidence by the time
the spinners hand over their caps to the umpires,
cannot be termed as 'remote'.
II. AUSSIE CONS, INDIA PROS
NO PONTING
Any team, even a world-beating side like Australia,
is bound to be affected by the absence of its
captain, although the cynics (if there are any
amongst Australian supporters) may claim that his
presence will not unduly affect the team, as he did
little right with the bat the last time he played a
series in India in early 2001.
HOW TO BAT IN INDIA? ASKS THE AUSTRALIAN
MIDDLE-ORDER
Openers Hayden and Langer apart, stand-in skipper
Gilchrist is the only batsman to have previously
batted in a Test on Indian soil. Michael Slater and
the Waugh twins, who did duty in 2000-01, have since
retired.
INDIA'S SPIN TWINS, AND AUSTRALIA'S OFF-SPIN
TRAVAILS
Kumble led India's bowling attack against Mark
Taylor's tourists in 1997-98 and bagged a
series-winning 23 wickets from three Tests. Three
years later, he was unavailable due to a shoulder
operation, but Harbhajan filled and fortified the
breach with 32 scalps from three Tests. This time,
both are fit, and raring to go on a Bangalore pitch
that is expected to turn. Australia have tended to
struggle against quality off-spin, as has been
proved down the years by the likes of Jim Laker,
Erapalli Prasanna and of course, Harbhajan Singh.
The Indian think-tank should not forget Virender
Sehwag's capabilities as an off-spinner. Like
Harbhajan, he could capitalize on the fact that the
Australian batting line-up is likely to feature five
left-handers; Hayden, Langer, Lehmann, Katich and
Gilchrist. An extra bowler who can turn it away from
these southpaws could be invaluable.
SUNIL MANOHAR GAVASKAR
A decade after he stepped in as 'Acting Coach' of
the Indian team when the incumbent Ajit Wadekar
suffered a heart attack during the Austral-Asia Cup
in Sharjah, Sunil Gavaskar will be seen again in the
Indian dressing-room, this time as 'Cricket
Consultant'. His inspirational presence and mastery
of the sport will undoubtedly help the team emerge
from the rut it has got itself into. However, the
cynics (and there are plenty amongst Indian
supporters) may well ask, "Where does that leave
John Wright?